Introduction To Cross and Joint Recurrence Plots
Googlefight CRP vs. JRP
Definition
Cross recurrence plot - a cross recurrence plot (CRP) is a graph
which shows all those times at which a state in one dynamical
system occurs simultaneously in a second dynamical system.
With other words,
the CRP reveals all the times when the phase space trajectory
of the first system visits roughly the same area in the
phase space where the phase space trajectory of the second
system is. The data length of both systems can differ, leading
to a non-square CRP matrix.
Joint recurrence plot - a joint recurrence plot (JRP) is a graph
which shows all those times at which a recurrence in one dynamical
system occurs simultaneously with a recurrence
in a second dynamical system. With other words,
the JRP is the Hadamard product of the recurrence plot
of the first system and the recurrence plot of the second
system. JRPs can be computed from more than two systems.
The data length of the considered systems has to be
the same.
Note: The following text is from 2000 and still has to be
revised.
Following Takens' embedding theorem (1981) we reconstruct the
phase space from a time
series uk
by using an embedding dimension m
and a time delay τ
x(t) = xi =
( ui, ui+τ, …, ui+(m-1)τ ),
t = iΔt,
whereas x(t) is the vector of reconstructed
states in the phase-space at the time t.
The choice of m and τ should base
on usually methods for detecting these parameters like
method of false nearest neighbours (for m) and
mutual information (for τ), which ensures the entire
covering of all free parameters and avoiding autocorrelated
effects (Kantz and Schreiber, 1997). Eckmann et al. (1987)
introduced the recurrence plot Ri,j
(Fig. 1).
This is an square array, that visualizes when a state in the phase space
will nearly recur. Every point of the phase space trajectory
xi
( i = 1 … N; N = n − (m − 1) τ
) is tested
whether it is close to another point of the trajectory xj,
i.e. the distance
between these two points is less than a specified threshold ε.
In this case the value one (a black dot, recurrence point) in a
N × N-array
Ri, j = Θ
( εi − || xi − xj||)
(Θ(⋅) is the Heaviside-function) is placed otherwise the
value zero (a white dot) is placed. Such
recurrence plot represents the behaviour of a single
trajectory in the phase space with typical long-scale and small-scale
structures. A recurrence point contains no information about the
special state.
|
|
Figure 1: Recurrence plot of the Southern Oscillation Index (SOI).
The diagonal structures represent the deterministic dynamics
of the El Ni no/ Southern Oscillation (ENSO). From the distance between
diagonal structures one can reveal cyclicities of recurrence
of a especially state of ENSO.
|
|
As an extension of these recurrence plots,
the recurrence quantification analysis (RQA), was introduced
by Zbilut and Webber (1992). It defines measures for diagonal segments in
a recurrence plot, recurrence rate, determinism,
averaged length of diagonal structures, entropy and
trend. The recurrence rate is the ratio of all recurrent states
(recurrence points) to
all possible states and is the probability of recurrence of
a special state. Stochastic behaviour causes very short diagonals,
whereas deterministic behaviour causes longer diagonals. Therefore, the
ratio of recurrence points forming diagonal structures to all recurrence
points is a measure for the determinism in the
system.
Diagonal structures show the range in which a piece of the trajectory
is rather close to another piece of the trajectory at different time. The
diagonal length is the time how long they will be close to each other and
can be interpreted as the mean prediction time. The inverse
of this measure is correlated with the Lyapunov-exponent (Eckmann, 1987).
The entropy means the Shannon entropy of the histogram of line segment
lengths and reflects the complexity of the deterministic structure in
the system. Stationary systems will deliver homogeneous recurrence
plots, instationary systems causes changes in the distribution
of recurrence points in the plot which is visible by brightened areas.
For example, a simple drift causes a brightening of the recurrence plot
away from the main diagonal to edges. The value trend measures this
effect by diagonalwise computation of diagonal recurrence density and its
linear relation to the time distance of these diagonals to the main diagonal.
Analogous to Webber and Zbilut (1998) we expanded the
method of recurrence plot to the method of cross recurrence plot,
which compares the dynamical behaviour of two time series,
which are embedded in phase space (Marwan, 1999). Here two time
series are simultaneously embedded in the phase space. The test
for closeness of each point of first trajecory
xi (i = 1 … Nx)
with each point of second trajectory
yj (j = 1 … Ny)
results in a Nx × Ny-array
CRi, j = Θ
( εi − || xi − yj||),
xi,
yi,
∈ ℜm,
which is called cross recurrence plot. Long diagonal structures show similar
phase space behaviour of both time series.
We have modified some RQA measures for quantifying the phase space
similarity. The recurrence rate RR,
determinism DET and
the averaged diagonal line length L were determined as a function
of the distance from the main diagonal,
e.g. the diagonal-wise recurrence rate would be
It is therefore possible to
assess the similarity in dynamics depending on a certain delay.
The second time series
was embedded with positive and negative sign, what gives us the type
of a possible correlation.
An example illustrates the application of our method.
We use a linear correlated noise process
(auto-regressive process) and couple it non-linear with
the x-component
of a Lorenz-System xn
(the quadratic exponent in the coupling term)
to a second order autoregressive process (Fig. 2)
yn = 1.095 yn − 1 −
0.400 yn − 2 +
0.700 ξn +
0.300 xn2,
(where ξ is white noise and
x is normalized to standard deviation
σ). The coupling is realized without any lag.
|
|
Figure 2: Time series of a nonlinear
related system consisting of a driven second-order autoregressive process,
forced by the squared x-component of
the Lorenz system.
|
|
The linear correlation analysis is not able to
detect any significant coupling or correlation
(Fig. 3b).
In contrast, our new method
finds a positive coupling with a lag of zero
(Figs. 3c-e).
|
|
Figure 3a: Cross recurrence plot between
the driven second-order autoregressive process and the forcing function
(x-component of the Lorenz system).
|
|

|
|
Figure 3b-e: Crosscorrelation (b),
RR (c), DET
(d) and L (e) between
the driven second-order autoregressive process and the forcing function
(x-component of the Lorenz system).
The solid lines show positive relation,
dashed lines show negative relation. The point-dashed lines represent
the significance levels.
The crosscorrelation function find none significant correlation but
the RR, DET
and L functions show a positive relation
with a lag of zero.
|
|
We prepare a test for significance with a set of
N surrogate
data. On the one hand these surrogates should reveal some features
like our original data but on the other hand
features which represent the randomness of possible correlation (stochastic
processes). Linear correlated noise are such systems. We calculate
a new surrogate time series for such system with the following iteration
function (autoregressive process of 3rd order)
xn = a1 xn − 1 +
a2 xn − 2 +
a3 xn − 3 +
b ξn ,
whereas ξ is white noise, n
runs from 4 to the value of the
desired length of the time series and
ak
are coefficients which
determine the behaviour of the system and allow us to adapt this
stochastic system to our natural systems. After this calculation we
apply our method to the natural data (e.g. SOI)
and to the surrogate data and determine the introduced measures
(RR,
DET, L).
We repeat this procedure (calculation
of surrogate data and application of the method) for
N-times.
The result is a distribution of our measures for the unrelated
systems. For each measure we obtain the
(p-1)-quantiles for the
error level of p (e.g. 10%),
which is the one-side significance level for this error level.
With this significance levels we assess the significance
of the revealed measures of CRP and the interrelations of the natural systems.
An further interesting feature of cross recurrence plots is the
line of synchronization (LOS). This line reveals the relationship
of the both systems in the time domain.
|
|
Figure 4: Lines of synchronization in cross recurrence plots between
harmonic functions, where the second function has a modification in the
time domain (black: no modification, blue: small variation,
red: stronger variation in the time domain of the second function).
animated plot
|
|
A fitting of this LOS with a nonparametric function allows to re-synchronize
both systems. However, both systems should have a similar dynamical
evolution. Applications e. g. in adjustment of geophysical data which
were gained from different boreholes or cores.
Another multivariate approach to recurrence plots was introduced
by Romano et al. and is called joint recurrence plot (2004), and
is simply the product of two (or more) recurrence plots of the
data series
JRi, j =
Θ
( εx − || xi − xj||)
⋅
Θ
( εy − || yi − yj||),
xi,
∈ ℜm,
yi
∈ ℜn,
i, j=1…N.
Such joint recurrence plots have the advantage, that the data can be different
observables and can have different magnitudes. They can be used for
the detection of phase synchronisation.
References
- CASDAGLI, M. C.:
Recurrence plots revisited. In: Physica D 108 (1997), 12-44
- ECKMANN, J.-P., S. Oliffson Kamphorst, D. Ruelle:
Recurrence Plots of Dynamical Systems. In:
Europhysics Letters 4 (1987), 973-977
- MARWAN, N., M. Thiel, N. R. Nowaczyk:
Cross Recurrence Plot Based Synchronization of Time Series.
In: Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics 9 (2002), 325-331
- MARWAN, N., J. Kurths:
Nonlinear analysis of bivariate data with cross recurrence plots.
In: Physics Letters A 302 (2003), 299-307
- MCGUIRE, G., N. B.Azar, M.Shelhamer:
Recurrence matrices and the preservation of dynamical properties.
In: Physics Letters A 237 (1997), 43-47
- ROMANO, M., Thiel, M., Kurths, J., von Bloh, W.:
Multivariate Recurrence Plots. In: Physics Letters A 330 (2004),
214-223
- SHOCKLEY, K., M. Butwill, J. P. Zbilut, C. L. Webber Jr.:
Cross recurrence quantification of coupled oscillators.
In: Physics Letters A 305 (2002), 59-69
- ZBILUT, J. P., C. L. Webber Jr.:
Detecting deterministic signals in exceptionally noisy
environments using cross-recurrence quantification.
In: Physics Letters A 246 (1998), 122-128
Further
references about RPs, RQA and their applications.
© 2010 SOME RIGHTS RESERVED
The material of this web site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Germany License.
Please respect the copyrights! The content of this web site
is protected by a Creative
Commons License. You may use the text or figures,
but you have to cite this source
(www.recurrence-plot.tk)
as well as N. Marwan: Encounters With Neighbours -
Current Developments Of Concepts Based On Recurrence Plots
And Their Applications, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Potsdam,
ISBN 3-00-012347-4.
|